Through watching the video on the visual history
of technology, reading chapter 2 on “Rethinking
Technology in Schools” and through the supplemental reading, I found myself
struggling to decide whether my chosen technology had impacted my content area
for the better or for the worse. Through this historical context, I have come
to the realization that film has been the communication technology that has
impacted English the most. Like many other technologies, film seems to have
made a crucial impact on English for the better. Through reading about Grace ,
her experiences with film and those of her mother and grandmother, it is
obvious that in some aspects film has had a negative impact in education. First
of all, in some ways, principals and other administrators believed that films
were less boring substitutes for teachers and that they were more lively ways
for students to really learn (Domine 44). However, films were also used in
Language Arts and other classes to illustrate correct lip and tongue movement
for pronouncing words (Domine 45). This could have been especially helpful to
English teachers because they could enhance the pronunciation of difficult
vocabulary words, while also teaching simple, basic words to newcomers who were
learning English.
In the video, I also saw that some of the small
clips they made and showed the students were on how to build your vocabulary.
Lessons like those can be very helpful to students and can serve as a
reinforcement of something already taught. However, like Grace’s grandmother
states, it is better to study “film and radio programs as texts to be
critically analyzed rather than celebra[te] the machines themselves (Domine
44). In these situations, when films served as supplementary materials to the
lesson and not as substitutes for the teachers, I believe they served as
beneficial inventions and that the only time when films were negative, was when
the administrators tried to substitute the knowledge of a real human for that
of a machine. In every other case, like in the creation of programs like Sesame
Street, film has had a beneficial impact on technology and on the English
classroom. For all this, I believe that as a result of the creation of film, we
can now show movies that were created from books like Beowulf, The Crucible, The
Scarlet Letter and its modern version Easy
A, etc… These movies do not teach the students the complete story, but
serve to reiterate the plot and as visual forms of what they have learned
through reading the original books.
Every good book, must then become a good movie
Works Cited
Works Cited
Domine,
Vanessa. "A Social History of Media, Technology and Schooling." The
National Association for Media Literacy Education’s Journal of
Media Literacy Education 1 (2009): 42-52. JMLE. Web.
Domine, Vanessa. "Rethinking Technology in Schools Primer." New York: Peter Lang, 2009. Print.
I concur that films can be used to enhance the learning and understanding of English novels for students. Films however should be implemented as a supplementary resource for a lesson on a novel/topic that has already been authentically explored in class readings, discussions, assignments, etc. They should not be considered as an alternative (express) route for engaging in reading and analytical thinking. Many individuals (no doubt students) unfortunately prefer to discover a story only through film rather that by dedicating some time to read the original novel version. In my opinion, for a great story to be truly appreciated & richly unfold, one has to experience it as the genuine novel it was initially created as. I am not remiss to the fact that a film can phenomenally recreate the work of a novel, with can have the effect of attracting viewers to seek the novel version for a more detailed portrayal.
ReplyDelete